Ronald McDonald Has the Wrong Aspect Fixed

Ronald-McDonaldLong thought lost, little missed McDonald’s mascot Ronald McDonald is back in the news. Not since back in 2011 when there was a call to retire the use of the character, has the news bothered covering this mascot. And what its covering is his covering: specifically that instead of wearing a yellow jumpsuit, he’s now dressed relatively normally.

vintage interior with brick wall

And here’s a photo of it where he appropriately looks like he got caught in the spotlight trying to escape the institution.

God knows why anyone would bother with a change like that. Ronald is, at the end of the day, a clown. That is his triumph or his failure. Either kids ages 3-5 will find him charming because he’s bright, superficially happy and colorful, or they will hate him because he’s a clown and clowns are like adults gone wrong. Dressing business casual instead of in a jumpsuit isn’t going to change that. But at least they didn’t give him some sort of 90s EXTREME outfit.

scary-ronald-mcdonald

This isn’t what I meant at all, but this picture is just too good not to use in some way.

It’s not Gunaxin’s position that the food McDonald’s serves needs to change portions or anything. It’s up to customers, especially parents to provide themselves and their dependents with a reasonable diet. Ronald is not an unfair way to appeal to children or anything of the kind. If anything, he’s frankly McDonald’s giving itself a handicap to level the playing field.

bkkingmascott

It also remains the only possible explanation for this guy.

The real question remains: Why not appeal to their consumers mischievous side and make the Hamburglar their mascot? Or maybe they could go with the Grimace? What is that thing anyways?

Hamburglar-Grimace-1332884216